My “disingenuous” email to Trevor S Valle

Below is the email in its entirety with headers – for verification that the content is unchanged. What started out as a simple question for clarification on a statement turned into a two-day tirade that ended with threats to use his concealed carry permit against me for the crime of being in LA (A city I have been to often and will be in this week). I will also be including the entire thread of his irrational responses, up to, and including calling me – a descendant of Russian Jews escaping annihilation of two regimes, and after I told him this – a “Nazi”. In over ten years of asking for clarification on statements from people, I have never had someone as thick-headed, violent, and mean, as Trevor Valle. Read below and please tell me what sounds disingenuous. Remember, this is a twitter verified semi-public figure. Wait until you see the twitter feed. More to come. Enjoy. (PS I’m breaking the Amazon link so it doesn’t appear like an ad). All of this because he couldn’t clarify a ridiculous statement he made publicly.

What? “I didn’t read your email” it but he knows its “disingenuous”. He’s made his contact info public everywhere. He’s a public figure. A public figure who says he’ll use us CCW if anyone asks him about his statements in person. He’s made his email public on even Breaking Bio podcasts. He also doesnt understand the term “dox” and does what SJW’s always do; redefine words to use them for their advantage.

MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.179.164 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 22:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 01:27:52 -0400
Delivered-To: douglasmatthewstewart@gmail.com
Message-ID: <CAFAu7R5HJng=v4Zsx9YMtjMkeJFjJz3xZu1MCSfv1biLk_sfrA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Still need clarification on your statement
From: Douglas Stewart <douglasmatthewstewart@gmail.com>
To: tattoosandbones@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=”94eb2c0e3d02bf75f80559983c48″

–94eb2c0e3d02bf75f80559983c48
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=”UTF-8″

Hi Trevor,

Twitter is a horrible place to try and convey context. And I know you get
incessantly trolled. However, I think the one time I sent you something you
were very good about replying to it. A few months back radio host Jimmy
Church had been filling in for Coast to Coast (Believe me, when Im up my
eyes almost roll out of my head listening to that). During the broadcast he
said that transitional fossils dont exist. I called him out and said it was
“patently false” and CC’ed you. And you responded to him to challenge that
claim. Other than one other pro-Trevor comment I don’t believe I have ever
said anything to you on twitter. I may be wrong. If I did it was never
anything negative or challenging. I think I first discovered you via Rogan,
and Im pretty sure I even caught the podcast with Take That Darwin
(Breaking Biology?) podcast but dont hold me to that last one. It may have
been before or after. However, following you has been a treat sometimes and
at others I’ve sort of pitied the relentless trolling. My opinion is that
the verified check can be a curse for some people. Real trolls use that as
a license to be total pricks. I think we forget that there are real people
behind a lot of these avatars.

It was also the subject of an upcoming story. A friend of mine was over
discussing edits (I try not to have bylines anymore) and wanted to pitch a
story to her editors (probably a Sunday edition) Since shes still new to
this publisher shes trying to cut her teeth and avoid just getting paid
kill fees. When I told her that the verified can attract relentless swarm
of trolls her opinion was that [sic] “Famous people aren’t really being
harassed because the ones that matter dont even look at replies or have
someone manage their accounts”. And thats when we started talking about a
few figures that get trolled relentlessly. Your name came up (from me). And
when I opened twitter, sure enough I saw the tweet that I first replied to.

She had thought it was a weird statement and neither of us understood
exactly what was being said. So I said “I’ll find out, he’ll reply. He’s
good about that” and fired it off. In hindsight I probably should’ve sent a
blank open tweet asking you about the whole thing rather than jump into the
middle of a contentious thread. I’ll spare you not type the hindsight
cliche!

I’m still looking for clarification regarding your statement. It appeared
to a blanket condemnation of a certain people which isn’t always bad (for
example “ISIS sucks” is fine). And I guess what confused me the most was
the wording of “campaign”.

So as I saw that I first wanted to clarify if you were referring to the
presidential campaign that has just ended or if you were referring to the
administrations actions writ large. This was the clarification I was
seeking.

Your original response was curious. You stated that by not taking action to
stop the current administration it was suffice to call a person complicit.
I found this to be weird on a few levels. Mostly because it makes a blanket
condemnation to people for not doing something. This means that any
write-in is included in that. Anyone who left the top of ticket blank is
included. But even more troubling is that if anyone even supported the DNC
candidate they are also supporting a campaign of blatant racism. So the
only clarification you gave me didn’t clarify anything at all. Rather it
gives carte blanche to anyone that wants to just point and shriek and call
someone a racist if they choose. Ist a strange position to take or even
suggest to advocate coming from someone who is so clearly above that.

It was a relief when I saw your frustration regarding the election on the
last Rogan appearance. When you said you were voting Cthulu. One second
before that I said “Oh no, its going to get political” and thank goodness
it didnt. On a side note, Library of America has a great volume with a
bunch of Lovecraft’s stories. The nice thing about these volumes is they
contain a full timeline of the author’s life and other notes. If you ever
get a chance check it out, I think you would like it. The literary and
academic talent they utilize to bring these volumes together are second to
none.

amazon[dot]com/H-P-Lovecraft-Library-America/dp/1931082723

In closing, I guess I’d like to say that I was not, in any way, trolling
you. I have been on twitter a long time and I’ve never had any problems. I
have never been called a Nazi; odd that you called me a “Pro-Trump” “Nazi”
even after I told you that I left the top of the ticket blank. The greater
irony is that half of my family fled purges (as Russian Jews) twice. One
time was from Russia post revolution, the second was in Eastern Europe
shortly there after. In Russia, one was tossed into the prison system. His
crime unknown. After 6 months of requests the response was that he was
“Deprived of the right to communicate”. Which was code language for being
executed. Later, in Eastern Europe a few must’ve been caught up in the
sweeps of the ghettos. We don’t know. And its what has lead me to be
fervently Anti-Nazi, Communist, racists my entire life. Its also been the
foundation for my love of history, especially revolutionary and
post-revolutionary Russia.

But I’m also not someone who takes insults too personally. Especially when
they are the product of misunderstanding. When I was still working with the
joint division ABC/Yahoo! News many times I would ask someone something on
twitter and get a wicked backlash. Why? Well, its the environment. Its the
structure. It is the playground of the petty. And everyone is just an
avatar, right? Maybe. I don’t think so. You’re a real person. I am a real
person. And my intention was strictly to clarify a statement that *still*
doesnt make sense. I would love to get an explanation and I would also like
to protest in your defense that you are not the irrational one here. I
would like to be able to convince the writer I put onto this that it really
was a misunderstanding. Feel free to contact me to clarify. Email or phone.
My cell number is below. Im in the air tomorrow morning but I’ll be free
from 11am EST from there on out.

Thanks in advance,

Douglas Stewart
douglasmatthewstewart@gmail.com
+1 203 752 **** (cell)

Screengrabs:

This isnt the only time he mentioned using his CCW on me. Matter of fact, this is response number 2 in the thread. Every response is frozen. And will be here soon. PS – I have never in my life removed anything because of threats. Ever. And I never will. If anyone has a problem with it file suit.

After telling him twice that I left the top of the ticket blank and told him I was Jewish, this is one of his handful of Nazi tweets. What should be noted here is that a Jewish “Nazi sympathizer” is also used interchangeably with “Nazi Collaborator”; this is the nearest equivalent to calling a black person an “Uncle Tom”. I like that he and his friend Contra Points (barely distinguishable when she isnt in her make up) decided to get together for a nice middle-finger picture. I hope they did that for me.

 

There’s such a grand irony in  all of this and why I even happened to see his stupid twitter exchange. Its really the best part And I’ll publish it with the rest of his stupidity to me shortly. Very simple. Trevor made an awkward statement. When asked to clarify he tried to be Kierkgaard and fumbled. To cover up the logical fallacy he went on the attack. And never relented. When I publish his entire maniacal tirade I’ll still give him the chance to respond, as promised. But he’s an angry SJW and needs to hide behind the safe space of twitter. He is even scared of emails. He lies, deflects, projects, threatens, obfuscates. Everything SJW junior post-modern intellectual midgets do. They cant help it. SJWs would rather burn everything down than admit fault in anything they have said or done. They are too afraid of how the tribe will perceive them. Let it be his downfall. My offer still stands to honor his rebuttal. After he clarifies his bullshit childlike logic.

-DMS

 

 

 

Ameripundit Responds to my Accusations…And not one fact can be proven.

A while back I had a run in with a fake conservative/fake twitter account @Ameripundit. In most respects he was a typical troll except he was a conservative who attacked other conservatives for no reason. Some attacks were based on race while others were misogynistic. Not only was this strange but when confronted he began to delete his tweets. I screen-capped them before he had a chance to. Basically, he got trolled softly.

For your review:

My Original Post in which I confront @Ameripundit, catch him being racist and misogynistic, and screen cap the whole conversation can be FOUND HERE

Now compare that to Ameripundits follow up post. (Be careful of the script) He cant prove a single thing he claims. Why you ask? Simple, no defense exists for him. He cant even show screen caps of our tweets because he rushed to delete them 🙂 Not a single claim can be backed up. I simply asked him how and why he was attacking someone I knew personally for no reason @RachaelJ83 who was at the time in the process of  becoming a contributor on this blog (which is now finalized) . His response was to DELETE EVERYTHING

Ameripundit claims that he is from New Jersey and was part of the New Jersey Tea Party. Here is the problem:

1) He is not from New Jersey like he claims (sorry “mate” youre not)

2) I have 38 sources directly involved with the Tea Party movement in New Jersey alone who DO NOT FOLLOW HIM AND NEVER HEARD OF “John van Metren” aka Ameripundit

The problem is this: I know everyone and Ameripundit knows no one. Furthermore no one knows him.

How you can win $50 for Retweeting!

A few weeks back I ran a contest to bring awareness to the Ameripundit profile and his behaviour (I’ll use his “Queen’s English” spelling). This contest will be similar. I will make a new post revealing details of Ameripundits new racist and misogynistic attacks, entirely unprovoked, on fellow Conservative women. To get entered you will only need to tweet the post and include @dmatthewstewart and #teamrachael. When I see it in my mentions I will respond that you are entered in the raffle.

PRIZES

In the last contest I offered a $25 prize for those participating. This time around I am doubling it and making it $50! You can receive payment any way you like. It can be paypal, cash in the mail, gift card of your choice, or even in Bit Coin. Whatever you want! Our last winner can give testament as to just how easy I am to work with when it comes to pay time!

Common Ground

Dear Ameripundit,

Truth be told I am still willing to give you (Ameripundit) the benefit of the doubt. But in order to do so we must meet on common ground in a neutral environment. If he is truly a conservative like he claims to be thtn we can meet on talk radio. I will let him choose the moderator, the time, and the show. If he does not have one in mind which can host us to hash out our problems I will appear on one he can create on Blog Talk Radio for free. I promise. I also promise to be civil and fair. Anyone who really knows me will tell you that I am always fair. I will not shout you down, I will not name call, I will not cut you off while you are making a point. In order to ensure this the moderator of tour choice can receive payment from me via paypal of $1,000 and transfer payment to you for every time I violate my own rules. I am not anonymous and I do not hide. Ever. This is clear from my contact page  and I have no reason NOT to meet you in a formal debate. And you can still remain anonymous, I care not about this. I have already ID’ed you and it is in the encrypted file on my first post on you. I will allow you to make the rules, assign the moderator, and “set the record straight” Join me wont you?

Race business gets too big for Sharpton

The Racism business is hotter than ever. It is expanding at such a rate that a top dog in that market is nearly being put out of business.  The NY Post today reports that Al Sharpton’s National Action Network “may not survive”.

Since racism is the only industry with almost no regulation the competition is fierce; so fierce that not even a true master tradesman could keep up.

Black and White

For example-

Disagreeing with the President’s social or fiscal policies makes you racist

Investigating the Congressional Black Caucus’ ethically challenged membership makes you racist

Even using the term “Black Hole” makes you a racist (It’s not scientific anymore)

So it is a competitive field and it seems that you can’t teach an old dog any new tricks. Maybe the Reverend should have learned how to Shirley Sherrod. She was able to tell a personal story of redemption based on her past racism and in the same breath unveil her current racism. Those investigating the story instead became the racists. That is how the real pro’s operate!

Sorry ladies, the Left says you have to go back to the kitchen…you’re destroying the family…and the “mixed success” of slavery…welcome to the anti-logic of the Left

Any fans of Glenn Beck’s television show will remember a few weeks back when he played a short clip of the the angry bald communist/journalist, Jed Brandt, advocating the takeover of American business by force. (video below) As shocking as that sounds to some of us that believe in private enterprise, Beck goes on to show how the group, The Brecht Forum, may have been the recipient of stimulus cash via the Tides Foundation.

What I find more shocking is the anti-logic, sexism, racism, and economic illiteracy that is now directly entwined in our public policy via groups like the Brecht Forum.

Dick Wolff in constant state of "butthurt"

I would like to introduce you to one of their members/teachers; Richard Wolff, who has somehow earned a PhD and is a self-proclaimed Marxist economist. You can read his “About Me” here.

What is left out from that page is that he was an adviser to Michael Moore for “Capitalism: A Love Story”. He discusses that in an audio presentation given at The Brecht Forum titled Psychology and Economy. (I advise you to listen to it for yourself and not take my word for it) The first part alone is rife with historical errors, racism, and sexism.

Dr. Wolff states that “Consumerism is an American invention”. The term “consumerism” was coined in America (circa 1940) but if we look at the definition from Merriam Webster consumerism is defined as “the promotion of the consumer’s interests”. If we accept that definition we must partake in the Marxist’s favorite past time; Revising history. Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations was printed in 1776 and to this day is the most thorough study on “consumerism” for its time (and for hundreds of years later as well)

Slavery

Later around the 14-minute mark the professor makes a false, outlandish, and borderline racist statement. On the supply of laborers in America he states that “Slavery was a very mixed success”

It’s not entirely clear what he means by this but that satement is patently false. In the North where slavery was abolished there was a massive increase in the labor force due to growing enterprise and workers operating freely in their own best interest. The South remained depressed and undeveloped precisely because of the negative impact of forced labor. In the South, workers’ only incentive was to escape, not to produce.  Producing just meant they weren’t subject to torture

Women in the workforce

(aka The destruction of the family)

Stop destroying the family

According to the disturbed professor the destruction of the American family began when women began to enter the workforce. Allow me to quote the moron: “If the mother or wife goes out to work she needs all kinds of expensive things.” The doctor cites that it didn’t work out economically because the extra revenue “Got pissed away” on the added expenses like a car and work clothes. However, according to this “economist” that wasn’t even the major problem. By [sic] “moving the mother out of the home it threatened to disrupt the institution of the family” as “opposed to staying home with the kids all day”. He goes on to say that in the early 80’s the Republicans seized on the opportunity to blame the destruction of the family on Homosexuals.

The Takeover of Enterprise

But wait theres more…Act now and you can learn how to take over private enterprise with the help of “Good” government policy and coercion. For the “New Labor Forum’s” Winter 2010 newsletter Dr. Wolff has an interesting piece entitled The Takeover of Enterprise which advocates and outlines the steps and strategies to be taken to use Government (Department of Labor) to help the workers “take over” a private enterprise. He goes on: “[We need to] replace [the employer-employee relationship] with a communitarian organization”

(Wait, dont we remember Howard Dean talking about moving towards a more “communitarian” society while speaking in Paris?) Isn’t this the goal of current recess appointed Craig Becker?

Under the EFCA, or Card Check, this goal is accomplished. From Discover the Networks:

In effect, the federal government will gain the power to dictate the terms of a contract and to set wages, benefits, hours, and work rules. Because negotiations for new contracts almost always take more than 120 days, this provision will ensure a significant expansion of government into the private sector.

Other Great pieces of Wisdom from the degenerate doctor

“The so-called crisis in Greece”

Greek strikers 02/10

Capitalism Hits the Fan

(ironically the video has a watermark “For Preview Only” across the whole screen because he wants you to buy it and not redistribute his wealth)