The Department of Energy’s EERE (Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy) Program has released a new online tool called BITES. Im not kidding. BITES is the abbreviation for the “Buildings Industry Transportation Electricity Scenarios” which is currently in its beta version. The website itself actually looks pretty cool; it actually may not “bite”, at least not upon first impression. By creating certain scenarios people can measure their energy output across various categories. In addition, the BITES tool can help an individual or business get an idea of how to cut back on energy use, what can be saved by switching to alternative fuels, etc. Just about any scenario can be plugged in and the user can get a very colorful and informative output; they can even make a shiny video! I am wondering how much this “tool” cost. Of course there is a section reserved for educators and classroom exercises will be available soon. That may, in fact, totally bite. We shall see.
Today the Department of Energy announced new regulations for dishwashers and clothes washers (washing machines). From the press release:
Wait, lets check out the contradiction in bold print that appears in the press release verbatim below
As part of the Obama Administration’s focus on taking sensible steps to save families money while also reducing energy consumption, the Department of Energy today announced common-sense energy efficiency standards for residential clothes washers and dishwashers that will save consumers $20 billion in energy and water costs. The new standards for both clothes washers and dishwashers were informed by important feedback from manufacturers, consumer groups, and environmental advocates, producing significant savings while retaining consumerchoice. The clothes washers standard announced today will save households approximately $350 over the lifetime of the appliance, while offering consumers a variety of more efficient machine choices
*So which one is it? will they be “reatining consumer choice” or “offering consumers a variety of more efficient machine choices”?
**Also does anyone proofread their press releases before they submit them to the public?
In order to make the announcement bearable to the regular consumer they must include the qualifiers that these decisions were made by consulting consumer groups, manufacturers, and environmental advocates. But in reality what happened was the consumer groups’ ideas and feedback are irrelevant. And the manufacturers already know that whatever Secretary Chu’s band of scary wanksters come up with in conjunction with the “environmental advocates” will become law/regulation no matter what.
So there you go folks. Energy Star just wasn’t enough. They must go farther. And somehow they are going retain consumer choice, and offer a variety of more efficient machines, by dictating to manufacturers what they will be allowed to produce.
Land of the free retained freedom; while offering a variety of more freedom.
On April 8 the Department of Energy released, via email newsletter, The EERE’s list of selected workforce groups assigned to receive Stimulus Funds in respect to advancing “Smart Grid” technology.
Mr. Mitola also served as a Director of Chicago Scholars (previously Scholarship Chicago) with current Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and Mayor Richard M. Daley
However, what Mr. Mitola’s new plant is set up to manufacture is already available in the market place and in use in the USA and two other continents
What are they Manufacturing?
Composite Technology Corporation is using Stimulus Cash to train and staff a new manufacturing plant creating Aluminum Composite Conductor Cores (ACCC) Basically, this is an electrical transmission wire that is insulated with aluminum conduits that allow for low sag (less tower construction/farther apart) and very low failure rate due to over heating. This design, in means of electrical transmission, is far superior to most old transmission lines still in use today.
So What’s So Special about Composite Technology Corporation?
Nothing. Instead of hustling up private investors CTC has decided to use political pull to fund a pet project. Plus, its much easier to operate with cash from the Department of Extra Money than it is to partner with investors whom will have a lot to say about your company’s daily operations.
Investors and Incentive vs. Free Money
The great contrast here is exhibited in the investment philosophy in both cases. As with 3M, they have been granted the right to have their product(s) used and available to utilities under a federal financing plan. They (the providers) must decide if it is in their customers best interest to pursue this. If it turns out to be an unfavorable idea amongst the customers and they proceed, they must answer to their customers and still pay the federal financing back. With Composite Technology Corporation the bill to hire and train their staff to produce the same product is absorbed by the public at large. Most of which will never know that their money was spent for this nor have a say in the matter. Furthermore, “Stimulus” jobs are supposed to be Union jobs under the Presidents orders. Has there ever been a Union made good that has been competitive in price to a similar product created under Non-Unionized labor? So not only are the costs hidden to the average person but they will likely being paying a higher cost to not only fund the staffing of the factory but also a higher unit cost in the end.